Prove It's
Safe to Ship

Security reviews don't pass on opinions. They pass on evidence. Risk scores with transparent methodology. Framework compliance with code-level proof. Go/No-Go recommendations with remediation plans.

Reports for security teams, executives, and customers. Structured evidence that passes review, earns approval, and closes deals.

The Reality

AI Projects Are Stuck

The technology works. Getting it approved and deployed is the bottleneck.

Everyone needs answers. No one has time to wait.

Different stakeholders, different questions, same evidence gap.

Security & Compliance
CISO, Security Team, Auditors
"What's the attack surface? Show me OWASP compliance."
OWASP LLM Top 10MITRE ATLASISO 42001
"Can this agent be prompt injected? Data exfiltration risk?"
Injection controlsData flow map
Business & Operations
CEO, Product, Legal, Finance
"What's the operational risk? Cost of failure?"
Risk scoreImpact analysis
"Are we EU AI Act compliant? HIPAA? SOC 2?"
EU AI ActNIST AI RMFSOC 2
Customers & Partners
Enterprise buyers, Procurement, InfoSec
"Complete this security questionnaire. 200 questions."
Auto-generatedEvidence attached
"How do you secure your AI? Send documentation."
Due diligence packAudit-ready
↑ Closes deals faster
Customer security reviews blocking your pipeline?
Engineering & DevOps
AI Engineers, Platform, SRE
"Is this agent ready for production? What's missing?"
Go/No-GoRemediation plan
"Push findings to my IDE. Block the PR if critical."
IDE integrationCI/CD gates
The Fix

Automated Evidence. For Every Stakeholder.

One analysis generates all the reports you need: security, compliance, customer-facing.

Minutes, Not Months
From 12-18 month cycles to same-day approval
Always Current
Evidence that stays fresh as your agent evolves
One Source of Truth
Same data, tailored for each audience

Reports for Every Stakeholder

Different audiences need different views. Same data, tailored presentation.

CISO Security Assessment

For: Security Leadership

The full picture. Static analysis, dynamic observation, compliance mapping, and code-level evidence. Everything security needs to make the call.

Contains
  • Go/No-Go recommendation with reasoning
  • Risk score with transparent methodology
  • Framework compliance grids (OWASP, NIST, EU AI Act, and more)
  • All findings with code evidence
  • Static + dynamic correlation
  • Attack chain analysis
  • Prioritized remediation roadmap

Executive Summary

For: C-Suite & Leadership

One page. Go or No-Go. Key metrics, critical findings, and what needs to happen before production. No deep dives, just the decision.

Contains
  • Clear Go/No-Go decision
  • Risk score and compliance %
  • Top 3 critical findings
  • Regulatory & framework gaps
  • Required actions before deployment

Customer Due Diligence

For: Customers & Partners

When customers ask "How do you secure your AI agents?" hand them this. Security checklist, compliance status, and blockers in a format they expect.

Contains
  • Agent overview and data classification
  • Security checklist (pass/fail)
  • Compliance status summary
  • Testing methodology
  • Deployment blockers

Professional. Evidence-Based. Defensible.

Every report follows a structured format that security leaders recognize and trust.

CYLESTIO AGENT INSPECTOR
AI AGENT SECURITY ASSESSMENT
Agent: customer-support-agent v2.3.1
Analysis: Static + Dynamic | Dec 9, 2025
RECOMMENDATION: NO-GO
87%
sessions at risk
3
data exposure paths
2
critical blockers
2 Critical impacts identified:
CRITICAL
Data Exfiltration
Agent can aggregate and export sensitive data via messaging tools. Observed path in 4/62 sessions.
CRITICAL
Unauthorized System Access
Prompt injection allows bypassing access controls. 23/26 input paths exploitable.
RISK SCORE73/100 (HIGH)
OWASP LLM TOP 10 COMPLIANCE
LLM01
LLM02
LLM03
LLM04
LLM05
LLM06
LLM07
LLM08
LLM09
LLM10
Pass
Partial
Fail
N/A
Transparent Scoring

Risk Scores You Can
Explain and Defend

No black box scores. Every number has a formula. Know exactly what contributes to the risk assessment and why. Defend your numbers because you understand them.

Weighted scoring with clear methodology
Full breakdown in every report
Configurable thresholds for your context
Risk Score Breakdown
Tool Chain Risk40%
Dangerous tool combinations possible
Access Control Risk30%
Approval workflow gaps
Attack Surface Risk20%
Entry/exit point exposure
Code Quality Risk10%
Complexity and error handling
Rating Scale
0-25 LOW26-50 MED51-75 HIGH76+ CRIT
Compliance Built In

OWASP LLM Top 10
Evidence for Every Control

Every analysis maps to the industry standard for AI/LLM security. Not just a checklist, but evidence for each control showing exactly how you comply or where gaps exist.

  • Prompt injection detection with code references
  • Insecure output handling with validation proof
  • Excessive agency with tool chain analysis
  • All 10 controls with PASS/PARTIAL/FAIL status
Sample Finding
CRITICAL: Prompt Injection (LLM01)
User input directly interpolated into prompt without sanitization.
agent.py:47
prompt = f"User says: {user_input}"
Suggested Fix
safe_input = sanitize(user_input)
messages = [{"role": "user", "content": safe_input}]
Evidence Powers Governance

Evidence That Ships

The risk scores and compliance evidence you generate don't just inform decisions. With Cylestio Enterprise, they power deployment gates automatically. Ship at CI/CD speed because the evidence already exists.

Risk Score → Gate
Block if risk_score > 50
OWASP → Policy
Require LLM01 = PASS
Findings → Approval
Human review if critical
See Production Governance

Stop Explaining. Start Proving.

Generate the evidence stakeholders need. Unlock approval. Ship your AI agents.